Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost_1.34.1 on mac os X 10.5 64 bit.
From: Alain Leblanc (aalebl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-27 20:54:11


2008/10/27 Alexander Sack <pisymbol_at_[hidden]>:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Alain Leblanc <aalebl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to build boost 1.34.1 on mac os X 64-bit. In a previous
>> thread someone(Vladimir Prus) gave the following suggestion:
>>
>> ==========================================
>> You need to pass
>>
>> architecture=x86 address-model=64
>>
>> in addition to the above to bjam, or you may pass
>>
>> architecture=combined address-model=64
>> ==========================================
>>
>> and it looks like it was fine with boost 1.36. However when I try with
>> boost 1.34.1 I get the following message:
>>
>> libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp:1: error: CPU you selected does
>> not support x86-64 instruction set
>>
>> If I remove the achitecture=x86 option then it compiles, but the
>> resulting libraries are not 64-bit, base on the output from file
>> libbooost-XXX.dylib.
>> Is there anything in the 1.34.1 version preventing me from compiling
>> in 64-bit mode?
>>
>> I'm using gcc 4.0.1.
>
> Hmmmph. This worked for me. Are you using combined or 64-bit?
>
> Also macports.org has ports already to go for your Mac incase that will help.
>
> -aps
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>

Do you mean combined instead of x86? Using combined as a value for
either the address model or the architecture returns a message
indicating that it is not a valid value.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net