Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost 1.36]: Problems with bjam option --buildid
From: Daniel KrÃ¼gler (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-05 02:11:27
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Daniel KrÃ¼gler wrote:
>>> Now, if buildid is specified, the names are like this:
>>> and Jamroot code was buggy. Now the question is what symlink should be produced:
>>> Daniel, you get to decide :-)
>> Hey, what an honor! ;-)
>> We do not work with symlink output, but personally I would suggest
>> to use the second approach, i.e.
> I tend to agree. If somebody explicitly wanted to decorate libraries with buildid,
> the presumably they don't want any libraries or symlink to be accidentally confused
> with buildid-less versions.
> The patch is now in:
> Please let me know if it works for you.
Thanks, everything seems fine now!
Sorry for the late reply, but yesterday I had no chance to contact
this news group. Seems that there were technical problems to reach
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net