Re: [Boost-users] smaller / decoupled `filesystem' module?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] smaller / decoupled `filesystem' module?
From: Konstantin Litvinenko (to.darkangel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-07 16:47:39

tom fogal пишет:
> 
> This is a minor part of the application we're writing, so I can't
> really justify the size.  Has anybody out there written a `decoupled'
> filesystem, with less dependencies on other boost libraries?  Even a
> trimmed down version would probably suit or needs for quite some time.
> 
As I understand you, your problem not a size of boost.filesystem or how 
many dependencies it has. The problem is that boost.filesystem can't be 
integrated into your build system with one simple action. Am I right?