|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 11:02:35
Robert Dailey wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:watanabesj_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> AMDG
>
>
> francesco biscani wrote:
>
> - header-only library: if used with small operands, GMP can
> suffer some
> performance penalty related to function call overhead. Maybe
> it would be
> possible to minimize it using aggressive inlining?
>
>
>
> Optimizing compilers can inline across translation units, these days.
>
>
> No way! Really? That's so cool. What compilers currently utilize such
> an optimization?
Microsoft, Intel, LLVM-GCC with appropriate linker support (i.e. MacOS
linker, llvm-ld, or gold), experimental in GCC trunk, and probably others.
Sebastian
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net