Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 11:02:35

Robert Dailey wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:watanabesj_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>     AMDG
>
>
>     francesco biscani wrote:
>
>         - header-only library: if used with small operands, GMP can
>         suffer some
>         performance penalty related to function call overhead. Maybe
>         it would be
>         possible to minimize it using aggressive inlining?
>          
>
>
>     Optimizing compilers can inline across translation units, these days.
>
>
> No way! Really? That's so cool. What compilers currently utilize such
> an optimization? 
Microsoft, Intel, LLVM-GCC with appropriate linker support (i.e. MacOS
linker, llvm-ld, or gold), experimental in GCC trunk, and probably others.

Sebastian