Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Bug Sprint Report for Friday, May 29th
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-31 13:42:45

2009/5/30 Marshall Clow <marshall_at_[hidden]>:

> The following bugs appear to have been fixed, but the tickets were never
> closed.
> I would appreciate it if the library maintainers could verify this and close
> the tickets.
>     Iterator

Oh, I just closed this as it's certainly fixed. Then I realised that
it might have been mentioned on the list and found this.

> The following tickets are feature requests that are unlikely ever to be
> implemented.
> Should they be closed?
>     database

This one should definitely be closed as 'wontfix'. It's too open
ended. There's a better place for ignoring library requests:

>     concept_check
>     concept_check

I'd close there as well. They're very open ended and nothing to do
with concept check. The allocator request could possibly be requested
for other libraries. Anyway, they're so old I can't imagine requester
has probably given up by now.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at