Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Function] Potential bug with ref-wrapped function objects?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-04 10:15:09

Next message: Joseph Garvin: "[Boost-users] Why does bind have overhead?"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile error using boost's tr1::bind"
In reply to: Dave Bonora: "[Boost-users] [Function] Potential bug with ref-wrapped function objects?"

AMDG

Dave Bonora wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> Boost.Function is exhibiting differing behavior in different boost releases:
>
> //--------------------------
>
> <snip>
>
> //---------------------------
>
> I'm assuming 1.35.0 is demonstrating the correct behavior whereas 1.39.0 is
> exhibiting a bug,
> but I thought I'd defer to the group before I reported it. Am I correct?
>

It seems to be okay in the trunk.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Next message: Joseph Garvin: "[Boost-users] Why does bind have overhead?"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [Boost-users] Compile error using boost's tr1::bind"
In reply to: Dave Bonora: "[Boost-users] [Function] Potential bug with ref-wrapped function objects?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net