Re: [Boost-users] [pool] singlton_pool::malloc returning bad address

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [pool] singlton_pool::malloc returning bad address
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-03 00:27:14

AMDG

Jonathan Leonard wrote:
> It's called with 5 different data structures (all with a different size).  I'm not exactly sure the distribution of these but can measure it if that would be of use.  Here are the [obfuscated but structurally-equivalent] types:
>
> struct T1
> {
> 	C* _p;
> 	boost::function<void (int, bool)> _f;
> 	unsigned __int64 _offset1;
> 	unsigned __int64 _offset2;
> 	boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<BYTE, VirtualAllocator<BYTE>>> _vec;
> };
>
> struct T2
> {
> 	boost::function<void (bool)> _f;
> };
>
> struct T3
> {
> 	C* _p;
> 	C* _p2;
> };
>
> struct T4
> {
> 	C* _p;
> 	C* _p2;
> 	unsigned int _i;
> 	unsigned int _i2;
> 	C* _p3;
> 	unsigned int _i3;
> 	C* _p4;
> 	int _i4;
> };
>
> struct T5
> {
> 	C* _p;
> 	int _i;
> 	int _i2;
> 	unsigned int _i3;
> 	unsigned int _i4;
> };
>   

Which of these causes problems?
Or do the pools all get corrupted?

I've just tried running about 35 billion 8-byte allocations without any 
problems.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe