|
|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] implementing a new Range
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-29 12:18:42
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> I see. I forgot about the default implementation. The problem
> with this scheme is that if boost is an associated namespace of
> T, then boost::begin will be ambiguous with boost::range_detail::begin.
A solution could be to have all ranges in the boost namespace overload
begin to avoid the ambiguity.
Overloading that they already do with the current system.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net