Re: [Boost-users] implementing a new Range

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] implementing a new Range
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-29 12:45:34

AMDG

Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>
>> I see.  I forgot about the default implementation.  The problem
>> with this scheme is that if boost is an associated namespace of
>> T, then boost::begin will be ambiguous with boost::range_detail::begin.
>
> A solution could be to have all ranges in the boost namespace overload 
> begin to avoid the ambiguity.
> Overloading that they already do with the current system.

That isn't enough.  std::vector<boost::function<void()> > has
boost as an associated namespace e.g..

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe