|
Boost Users :
|
- Next message: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] Compiler warnings from Macs, IBM acc, Borland, Comeau, Metroworks, et al - are they a Problem?"
- Next in thread: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Mika Heiskanen: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
I am studying Boost Program Options library and I am curious, why was it
choosen double dashes as the token to identify an option in the command line
?
Example:
my_program --help
Would not a single dash be enough and less verbose ?
What is the rationale behind that ?
Thanks,
--
Mauricio Gomes
"Think globally, act locally".
- Next message: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] Compiler warnings from Macs, IBM acc, Borland, Comeau, Metroworks, et al - are they a Problem?"
- Next in thread: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
- Reply: Mika Heiskanen: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Program Options: Just curiosity, why double dashes ?"
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net