Re: [Boost-users] [Wave] Modifying the way function-like macros are interpreted

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Wave] Modifying the way function-like macros are interpreted
From: fractured_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-12-25 13:05:10

On 12/25/2009 12:59 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
> In that case you could easily make a stand-alone parser out of
> Spirit.QI that can do what you wish.  Use of the symbol table and
> skipping things you are not matching will work perfectly.  I doubt you
> would want to use Boost.Wave though as it would be difficult to edit
> and would do a *lot* more then necessary (and be slower because of
> that).
> ______________________________________________
>    
I still need wave as I am using it to provide #include and #define 
functionality, which LSL does not support. This however I have already 
implemented, I'm just trying to expand the functionality as much as I 
can using various preprocessing. I'll look up Spirit.QI though.