Re: [Boost-users] Object pools?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Object pools?
From: Ryan McConnehey (mccorywork_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-17 20:54:48

Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> the object should be guaranteed to not be destroyed if only
> pool or outside holder is destroyed, but should be guaranteed to be
> destroyed when both are destroyed.
>   
The only way I've currently found to have the object destroyed, if the 
pool is already gone, is to have a static class registered with the 
boost::shared_ptr.  This gives the static class the ability to destroy 
the object if the pool has unregistered itself.  I don't like this as it 
creates a bottleneck on deletes.

Ryan