Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Assign] list_of::range without an initial (single) element?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Assign] list_of::range without an initial (single) element?
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-16 12:59:58

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

>>> However, list_of<int>() inserts a default value (so that
>>> list_of<int>().range(a).range(b) == {0,1,2,3,4}).  
> 
> Maybe we should add
> 
>    empty_list_of<int>()
> 
> ? It's quite trivial to add.

Does list_of<T>() have a default value for its T parameter?

Maybe introduce no-params list_of<T>() to produce an empty list, while 
list_of<T>(const T&) keeps its current implementation? That would seem 
to behave intuitively in both cases...