Re: [Boost-users] Boost services

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost services
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-22 19:35:50

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Bo Jensen <jensen.bo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Vladimir Prus
> <vladimir_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Bo Jensen wrote:
>>
>>> I have a small business which uses boost quite  a lot, thanks for all
>>> the great code. I am missing some features at the moment. Is it either
>>> possible to donate to get some things done or does some qualified
>>> people offer such services for a fee ? More specifically I would like
>>> to see the doxygen integration being expanded.
>>
>> Could you give some more details? In particular, are you looking into
>> Boostbook improvements?
>>
>> - Volodya
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Boost-users mailing list
>> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>>
>
> It is actually very simple and would not take the right person very
> long I think, I just don't have the time or skills to do it the right
> way myself.
>
> I need following features :
>
> 1) Fix bug with array support i.e int myarray[] and not int [] array
> (I said it was simple :-)).

What bug is this that you are talking about? "int[] array" is correct,
"int array[]" is not?

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Bo Jensen <jensen.bo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2) Have arguments output like this :
>
> void somefunction(int one,
> Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  int two,
> Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  int three) and arguments should keep this
> order in detailed list.
>
> i.e not like this
>
> void somefunction(int one, int two, int three) where arguments later
> on is sorted in detailed list.

Good for doxygen work, but definitely not standard, and doxygen can
still decorate those in the primary description without needing to
expand them like that.

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Bo Jensen <jensen.bo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 3) Add see also support
> 4) Add group support

Also good doxygen things, but is there really any need?  Boostbook
should already describe the public interface.

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Bo Jensen <jensen.bo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 5) add C# support (which is supported by doxygen).

Er, C# support?  That seems impossible as this is C++ and C++ is
*vastly* more powerful then C#, boost uses just about everything in
C++ that C# does not come anywhere near supporting, what support are
you talking about?