Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdef BOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?
From: Patrick Loney (patrick.loney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-04 10:38:09

Next message: Marsh Ray: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] boost::serialization adds huge amounts of exports to resultant Windows PE file"
Previous message: Daniele Barzotti: "[Boost-users] [Log] When Boost.Log will became part of Boost?"
In reply to: Marsh Ray: "Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdef BOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdefBOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?"

+1 - We still develop with VC6 :( but that shouldn't hold back or slow down the development of boost; if we need to use any boost libraries we can carry on using old versions, if we need a new piece of functionality we can upgrade our compiler or roll our own.

Next message: Marsh Ray: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] boost::serialization adds huge amounts of exports to resultant Windows PE file"
Previous message: Daniele Barzotti: "[Boost-users] [Log] When Boost.Log will became part of Boost?"
In reply to: Marsh Ray: "Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdef BOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] Users! Who'd like to wave goodbye to #ifdefBOOST_MSVC6_* workarounds?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net