Re: [Boost-users] Boost Logos: proposed high constrast logo

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost Logos: proposed high constrast logo
From: alfC (alfredo.correa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-08 15:06:47

On Oct 7, 1:03 pm, Zoltan Juhasz <zoltan.juh..._at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Follow up on the original topic:
>
> I've uploaded a high-contrast version of the BoostLogo, and moved all
> otherlogorelated resources to the follow Google Docs folder:
>
> https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_WA6oW88X1UZWZiNzUwYzctYzg1NS00ZmY5...
>

Ok, thank you for your work. This is not what I was thinking when I
asked for a logo.
To me the logo is the three hexagon at the left of the word "Boost",
which is still not high contrats, it is just a dark background.
Anyway, I think what you did can be useful for some webpages.
Nevermind the "high contrast" logo it may not worth the effort as
someone said.

> The point is, it
> is not thelogowhich defines Boost, but the other way around.

I agree. If this were a soda brand the logo would be important. but
since Boost has content then the logo is less important. But
consistency is still important that I why I asked for opinions in a
high contrast "three hexagons".

Without Boost, C++ would be just a bunch of good intentions.

Alfredo