Re: [Boost-users] Boost Logos: proposed high constrast logo

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost Logos: proposed high constrast logo
From: Zoltan Juhasz (zoltan.juhasz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-08 16:41:04

Alfredo,

Apologies I failed to point out which are the high contrast variants
in my previous mail:

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_WA6oW88X1UNWEwOTdhNGMtMDJjNi00MzllLThhMzctYzc0YTVhNzE0ZGI0&sort=name&layout=list&num=50

Please see the "boost-hc-black.psd" and "boost-hc-white.psd". It
should be trivial to crop down the symbol part of the logo, or make
any color related modifications. Let me know if you need further help
with it.

Regards,
Zoltan

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:06 PM, alfC <alfredo.correa_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 7, 1:03 pm, Zoltan Juhasz <zoltan.juh..._at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Follow up on the original topic:
>>
>> I've uploaded a high-contrast version of the BoostLogo, and moved all
>> otherlogorelated resources to the follow Google Docs folder:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_WA6oW88X1UZWZiNzUwYzctYzg1NS00ZmY5...
>>
>
> Ok, thank you for your work. This is not what I was thinking when I
> asked for a logo.
> To me the logo is the three hexagon at the left of the word "Boost",
> which is still not high contrats, it is just a dark background.
> Anyway, I think what you did can be useful for some webpages.
> Nevermind the "high contrast" logo it may not worth the effort as
> someone said.
>
>> The point is, it
>> is not thelogowhich defines Boost, but the other way around.
>
> I agree. If this were a soda brand the logo would be important. but
> since Boost has content then the logo is less important. But
> consistency is still important that I why I asked for opinions in a
> high contrast "three hexagons".
>
> Without Boost, C++ would be just a bunch of good intentions.
>
> Alfredo
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>