Re: [Boost-users] [review result] mini-review of update to Boost.Assign

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [review result] mini-review of update to Boost.Assign
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-18 15:01:55

On 18/10/10 19:38, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Here follows the result of the result of Erwann Rogard's update to
> Boost.Assign:
>
> ****************************
> The update is not accepted
> ****************************
>
> This is not because the new functioanlity/interface was not seen as an
> improvement, but because Erwann has chosen to implement a full
> replacement (or Assign v2) based on the feedback he got during the
> review. The feedback meant that the new "update" would be much larger
> than what was present in the mini-review, and the new library should
> therefore be subject of its own full review.
>
> I would like to thank Erwann for his hard work so far, and hope he
> submits a Boost.Assign v2 in the near future.

I have a possibly silly question:

Does it use Boost.Proto?