Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess boost::interprocess xsi_shared_memory

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess boost::interprocess xsi_shared_memory
From: Daniel Neuberger (daniel.neuberger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-20 13:41:12

Is there a reason for not finishing the implementation of XSI (System
V) shared memory?  It seems like most of the work is already done.  If
there is no reason not to, I might be able to finish the
implementation so that it can be included in the next release.

I know that POSIX may be sufficient for some, but System V allows for
much better control using SELinux since it lives in kernel space.

FYI: This is in response to
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.user/64537.

Thoughts?  Thanks.

- Daniel