Re: [Boost-users] [Off topic] Strict Aliasing white paper redux

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Off topic] Strict Aliasing white paper redux
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-03 01:30:31

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Patrick Horgan <phorgan1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Some time ago, I posted a link here to my (then new) white paper on
> strict-aliasing. Â I wrote it because people keep posting, on this and on
> other lists, questions that show a basic misunderstanding of aliasing and
> what the rules in C and C++ standards on aliasing are intended to
> communicate. Â I got some great feedback and have posted a new revision,
> http://dbp-consulting.com/StrictAliasing.pdf. Â I'm hoping that people on
> this list will review the paper and tell me some more ways of improving it.
> Â My intention is to write a paper that will make it so that I won't have to
> keep answering the same questions over and over again;) Â I'll just point
> people at the paper.
>

Way cool Patrick! Thanks for sharing the link and the well-written document! :)

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
about.me/deanberris