Re: [Boost-users] large variant performance compared (50 elements)

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] large variant performance compared (50 elements)
From: Paul (peebor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-27 14:26:43

> [snip]
> The two attached files get me closer to a compilation.
> Two significant changes to the originals:
>
>    1) in assign_variant(,true), I had to disable the BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT
>       because if was always causing a compiler error.
>

This might also indicate your are trying to assign a type to the variant 
that is not one of the bounded types. See your callstack.

>    2) I had to forward declare:
>
>         CLoPtrVariant(const CLoPtrVariant<Typelist2>&  rOperand)
>
>       because the body used CConvertVariant which hadn't been declared
>       yet.
>

Odd, since its a template/argument-naming dependant function and the poi 
is way down it should give you no problems!? Anyway, its not used in 
your test anyway, so you may also strip it.

> However, I'm still getting a compile error with gcc4.5.1.  A partial
> list of the compilation output is also attached.
>
> Any ideas what's going wrong?
>
>    -Larry
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users