Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Phoenix V3: mini-review starts February 19th

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Phoenix V3: mini-review starts February 19th
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-02 12:06:17

Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Phoenix V3 is nearing its completion.
>
> With the port to Boost.Proto we tried to address the outstanding
> issues of the review and would like to announce that the mini-review
> will start on February 19th.
>
> Feel free to preview the code at:
>
>    https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/SOC/2010/phoenix3/
>
> and the documentation at:
>
>
> http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/SOC/2010/phoenix3/libs/phoenix/doc/ht
> ml/index.html
>
> We are currently occupied with code cleanups and finishing of the
> documentation.
> The code itself is in a stable condition, feel free to make yourself
> comfortable with this new library.
>
> Regards Hartmut
> Phoenix V3 Review Manager
> ---------------
> http://boost-spirit.com

I've been studying proto/fusion/phoenix.  Becoming familiar with this stuff
takes quite an effort.  It's quite interesting though.  And it seems ideal 
for
a project I want to do.  But I do have one question:

phoenix/Function objects
Functional/
Proto/
PolymorphicFunctionObject
?

All seem to address function objects.  There seems to be a lot of
overlap and it's not clear to me which I should be using for what.
That is, each library seems to address function objects from a
different perspective, but there is not summary which contrasts
them.  I need a "function object library Decoder Ring".  Are
there any documents which would help me out?

Robert Ramey