Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] value_at_c and its relatives not applicable to Associative Sequence?
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-21 04:21:18

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-users] [context review] Review starts today, Mars 21st 2011"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Concept Library - fusion and other libraries"
In reply to: TONGARI: "Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] value_at_c and its relatives not applicable to Associative Sequence?"
Next in thread: Gordon Woodhull: "Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] value_at_c and its relatives not applicable to Associative Sequence?"

On 3/21/2011 2:45 PM, TONGARI wrote:
> 2011/3/21 Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden] <mailto:joel_at_[hidden]>>
>
> Ok, the docs are wrong. I'm fixing it.
>
>
> OK, also: at / at_c / value_at.

Yep. Fixed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://boost-spirit.com

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-users] [context review] Review starts today, Mars 21st 2011"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-users] Boost Concept Library - fusion and other libraries"
In reply to: TONGARI: "Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] value_at_c and its relatives not applicable to Associative Sequence?"
Next in thread: Gordon Woodhull: "Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] value_at_c and its relatives not applicable to Associative Sequence?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net