Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-30 13:08:52
> I had thought we were discussing what was allowed on type T.
Sure, but that doesn't invalidate my statement that the standard's
limitations are too strict. I'm just thinking ahead.
> Yet "any sentence that starts with 'a clever compiler' should be viewed with
> suspicion" contradicts the very position you think is reasonable, and was
> stated as an answer to an example of an optimization a clever compiler might
I think you may have misunderstood. I think that it is a reasonable
position to view some optimizations as suspicious.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net