Re: [Boost-users] [Range] Proposal to add a new range adaptor (first_nd), or modify sliced

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Range] Proposal to add a new range adaptor (first_nd), or modify sliced
From: Jeff Flinn (Jeffrey.Flinn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-31 08:37:18

On 8/31/2012 2:56 AM, Szymon Gatner wrote:
> 2012/8/31 Akira Takahashi <faithandbrave_at_[hidden]>:
>> 2012/8/31 Neil Groves <neil_at_[hidden]>:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> On Monday, August 27, 2012, Nathan Ridge wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd be interested in the communities preferences with regard to choosing
>>> another review, or expedited merge.
>>
>> I agree with that.
>> I prefer marging to trunk, rather than wating for a formal review.
>
> I think it should be a merge also. In fact all library extensions
> should be just a part of usual maintenance and under owner's (current
> maintainer's) eye only. Library itself is accepted, extensions
> obviously follow design decisions of original so it really only comes
> down to making sure that implementations is good enough. Scheduling
> full review makes no sense imho as library usability and the design is
> already agreed upon.

+1

Jeff