Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-04 13:38:41

Next message: Alach: "[Boost-users] Problems in boost/mpl/aux_/template_arity.hpp when BOOST_MPL_CFG_NO_PREPROCESSED_HEADERS is defined on g++ 4.6.3 and boost 1.50"
Previous message: Chris Cleeland: "Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?"
Next in thread: Lars Viklund: "Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?"
Reply: Lars Viklund: "Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?"
Reply: Ingolf Steinbach: "Re: [Boost-users] Why is there so much co-dependency in Boost? Is there anything to be done about it?"

Am 04.09.2012 20:29, schrieb Robert Ramey:
> a) don't use "convenience headers" which suck in all the headers in a
> library rather than just the one's used.

I've read an advice on the mailing list that boost libraries should
provide a 'all.hpp' (containing all headers of the library). Is it not
recommended any more?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net