|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [thread][move] compiling move(thread) with Android NDK GCC4.7
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-17 12:10:24
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Le 17/01/13 03:34, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
> vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Le 16/01/13 18:38, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Igor R <boost.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> >> I forgot to mention, but the above code compiles under MSVC10 and iOS
>>> >> gcc toolchain...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ...which have rvalue references?
>>>
>>> Yes, you're right, it turns out that while the above compilers have
>>> c++11 enabled by default, in ndk gcc4.7 it's disabled by default...
>>>
>>
>> One suggestion: lobby for Boost.Thread to adopt Boost.Move rather than
>> its own internal move emulation machinery (or, better yet, supply a
>> patch!), and additionally use the Boost.Container data structures, which
>> are Boost.Move-aware AFAIK.
>>
>>
>> Boost.Thread make use of Boost.Move when BOOST_THREAD_USES_MOVE is
>> defined and can be used with Boost.Container or any standard c++ container.
>> The problem is that it doesn't provides both emulations at once.
>>
>
> Remind me what the limitation of Boost.Move's emulation are wrt
> Boost.Thread, and how Boost.Thread's internal emulation avoids that
> limitation?
>
> You misunderstood my concern. Boost.Move has no specific limitations
> with respect to Boost.Thread. Boost.Thread internal(old) emulation has more
> troubles than the one provided by Boost.Move.
>
> I forgot to tell that BOOST_THREAD_USES_MOVE is defined by default when
> BOOST_THREAD_VERSION >= 3. As the default version has not been changed to
> version 3 in 1.53 as planned BOOST_THREAD_USES_MOVE is still not defined.
> I'm all for defining BOOST_THREAD_USES_MOVE even for version 2, but this
> will changes the interface.
>
> Comments of those that were against moving to version 3.
>
Right, got it. Thanks for elaborating.
- Jeff
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net