Re: [Boost-users] Comparison boost spirit and ANTLR

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Comparison boost spirit and ANTLR
From: salvatore dario minonne (dario.minonne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-29 08:59:34

ATLR is LL as well

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Mathias Gaunard <
mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 27/05/13 20:06, Olivier Austina wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to choose a parser.
>>
>> I would like to use a parser for text processing (natural language
>> text). Which parser is suited in this case. In general which are the
>> benefit to use boost spirit instead of ANTLR or ANTLR instead of boost
>> spirit. Thank you.
>>
>
> ANTLR is LR, Spirit is LL.
> Spirit is embedded in C++, ANTLR is a separate preprocessor.
>
> Spirit is slow to compile and isn't very efficient at runtime, but it's
> fairly nice to use once you get used to it.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/**mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-**users
>

>

-- 
SDM