Re: [Boost-users] BJAM and VS2013RC

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] BJAM and VS2013RC
From: Lars Viklund (zao_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-19 19:47:51

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:26:22PM +0100, Craig Henderson wrote:
> VS2013RC does have deleted and default functions.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 19 Sep 2013, at 17:20, "Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> > On 18 Sep 2013 at 19:05, Lars Viklund wrote:
> > 
> >> Among them, I think pretty much only the Boost.Build patch has been
> >> applied to trunk, the rest are suffering either from quabbling about
> >> whether to support non-release compilers or plain neglect.
> > 
> > I've been running VS2013 RC last few days with the following 
> > additional features above and beyond VS2013 Preview turned on:
> > 
> > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE_N3276
> > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
> > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
> > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES

I believe that Niall, like me in my post, meant that these negative
feature macros shall be non-defined when targetting 2013RC.

The omission of a negative feature macro implies that the feature is
supported.

-- 
Lars Viklund | zao_at_[hidden]