Re: [Boost-users] BJAM and VS2013RC

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] BJAM and VS2013RC
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-20 12:13:24

On 20 Sep 2013 at 1:47, Lars Viklund wrote:

> > > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE_N3276
> > > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
> > > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
> > > //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
> 
> I believe that Niall, like me in my post, meant that these negative
> feature macros shall be non-defined when targetting 2013RC.
> 
> The omission of a negative feature macro implies that the feature is
> supported.

Correct. Sorry for being unclear, I should have emphasised the fact I 
had commented them out.

Niall

-- 
Currently unemployed and looking for work.
Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/