[Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines

Subject: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: Adam Romanek (romanek.adam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 05:13:36

Hi,

I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and 
boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's 
even recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions [1].

The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is 
there any "public" (documented) equivalent?

WBR,
Adam Romanek

[1] - http://www.boost.org/development/int_const_guidelines.html