Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: Krzysztof Czainski (1czajnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 07:17:42

2013/10/10 Adam Romanek <romanek.adam_at_[hidden]>

> Hi,
>
> I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and
> boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's even
> recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions [1].
>
> The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is
> there any "public" (documented) equivalent?
>
> WBR,
> Adam Romanek
>
> [1] - http://www.boost.org/**development/int_const_**guidelines.html
>

>
>
Hi,

I use Boost.Mpl for this. Please try boost::mpl::and, etc.

I'm curious about those boost::type_traits::ice_* things too, though.

Regards,
Kris