Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: Krzysztof Czainski (1czajnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 07:17:42
2013/10/10 Adam Romanek <romanek.adam_at_[hidden]>
> I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and
> boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's even
> recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions .
> The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is
> there any "public" (documented) equivalent?
> Adam Romanek
>  - http://www.boost.org/**development/int_const_**guidelines.html
I use Boost.Mpl for this. Please try boost::mpl::and, etc.
I'm curious about those boost::type_traits::ice_* things too, though.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net