Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: Krzysztof Czainski (1czajnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 07:17:42

2013/10/10 Adam Romanek <romanek.adam_at_[hidden]>

> Hi,
> I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and
> boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's even
> recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions [1].
> The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is
> there any "public" (documented) equivalent?
> WBR,
> Adam Romanek
> [1] -**development/int_const_**guidelines.html>

I use Boost.Mpl for this. Please try boost::mpl::and, etc.

I'm curious about those boost::type_traits::ice_* things too, though.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at