Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 11:39:25

> I use Boost.Mpl for this. Please try boost::mpl::and, etc.
>
> I'm curious about those boost::type_traits::ice_* things too, though.

They're antiquated now, as I believe all current compilers don't require 
such nastiness.  Same is true of the mpl equivalents, which were a later 
approach to the same problem.  Currently if I need to combine 
integral-constant-expressions I do so in the "natural" way with || && etc: 
it reads much better that way IMO.

John.