Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-21 18:31:59

On 21 January 2014 16:31, Gavin Lambert <gavinl_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Or worse, std::shared_ptr vs. boost::shared_ptr (as AFAIK there is no way
> to interop these without copying the underlying object, which breaks the
> semantics).

Well, you *can*, but it's a bit of a hack... <
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12314967/cohabitation-of-boostshared-ptr-and-stdshared-ptr
>.
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]