Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] conflicting intmax_t definitions - Boost 1.53 and gcc 4.8 incompatibility?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-21 20:01:05

On 22/01/2014 12:31, Quoth Nevin Liber:
> On 21 January 2014 16:31, Gavin Lambert <gavinl_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:gavinl_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>     Or worse, std::shared_ptr vs. boost::shared_ptr (as AFAIK there is
>     no way to interop these without copying the underlying object, which
>     breaks the semantics).
>
>
> Well, you /can/, but it's a bit of a hack...
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12314967/cohabitation-of-boostshared-ptr-and-stdshared-ptr>.

I was wondering if something along those sort of lines would work, after 
I posted that.  But that's actually pretty clever.  (Of course "clever" 
is not always a good thing in code.)