Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] More than strange performance test results of Boost.MultiIndex
From: Ben Pope (benpope81_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-18 20:50:21

Next message: Belcourt, Kenneth: "Re: [Boost-users] [EXTERNAL] Error "Used Uninitialized" in boyer_myrvold_impl.hpp"
Previous message: wanglurg: "[Boost-users] Error "Used Uninitialized" in boyer_myrvold_impl.hpp"
In reply to: Lars Viklund: "Re: [Boost-users] More than strange performance test results of Boost.MultiIndex"
Next in thread: Ernest Zaslavsky: "Re: [Boost-users] More than strange performance test results of Boost.MultiIndex"

On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 10:19 PM, Lars Viklund wrote:
> I wonder if GCC's stdlib still insists on using their abominable
> Copy-on-Write string implementation.

Looks like the SSO string is now in (as of 14-Nov), so I suspect that
means it'll appear in gcc 5.0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01785.html

Ben

Next message: Belcourt, Kenneth: "Re: [Boost-users] [EXTERNAL] Error "Used Uninitialized" in boyer_myrvold_impl.hpp"
Previous message: wanglurg: "[Boost-users] Error "Used Uninitialized" in boyer_myrvold_impl.hpp"
In reply to: Lars Viklund: "Re: [Boost-users] More than strange performance test results of Boost.MultiIndex"
Next in thread: Ernest Zaslavsky: "Re: [Boost-users] More than strange performance test results of Boost.MultiIndex"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net