Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 17:41:46

Next message: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [Boost-users] [asio] Using io_service for synchronous tcp accept + custom tasks"
Previous message: Merrill Cornish: "[Boost-users] boost variant + boost serialization unused type"
In reply to: Ioannis Papadopoulos: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"
Reply: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"

Ioannis Papadopoulos-2 wrote
> Shouldn't the serialization library recognize empty classes (through
> boost:is_empty) and handle those cases automatically?

serialization of an empty class is not an legal operation.

Robert Ramey

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-serialization-boost-variant-boost-blank-tp4671902p4671995.html
Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Gavin Lambert: "Re: [Boost-users] [asio] Using io_service for synchronous tcp accept + custom tasks"
Previous message: Merrill Cornish: "[Boost-users] boost variant + boost serialization unused type"
In reply to: Ioannis Papadopoulos: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"
Reply: Robert Ramey: "Re: [Boost-users] boost serialization + boost variant + boost blank"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net