Re: [Boost-users] Serialization cumulatively.

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Serialization cumulatively.
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-20 12:17:40

tcamuso wrote
> Problem is that the time to process the files this way is O(log n), ....

I would think that this is solvable, but I can't really comment without
spending significant time looking at the specific code.

> If there were linefeeds in the serialized data, the code to do this would
> be much simpler. 

I don't even remember if there should be line feeds in there.  certainly xml
archives have linefeeds.  
But again, I'd have to spend a lot of time looking at your specific case. 
Of course you could hire me by the hour if you like.

> Is there another, more architected way for me to deserialize an aggregate
> of serializations?

I think what you want to do should be possible in an efficient way. 
However, it would require spending enough time with the library to
understand how it works at a deeper level.  I realized that this defeats the
original appeal of the library to some extent.  But it's still better than
writing a new system from scratch.

Robert Ramey

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Serialization-cumulatively-tp4673059p4673553.html
Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.