Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] PBGL in shared memory
From: Marcin Zalewski (marcin.zalewski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-04 09:09:08
I think that if you need highest performance, you can probably find
libraries that are faster in shared memory than PBGL (e.g., Ligra, Galois).
Some of these systems are experimental and somewhat harder to use than
PBGL, so you should investigate the performance tradeoff for the particular
use you plan.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:40 PM Ð¯ÑÐ¾ÑÐ»Ð°Ð² <yaroslavkishchenko_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi guys, I need to write some graph parallel algorithms
> and I decided to use boost graph library for this. There
> are also PBGL. So my question is, is PBGL works great in
> shared memory environment. My algorithms will be used in a
> competition, so I know that it will be launched on a
> single machine, but with quite high number of cores. Is it
> worth to use sequential BGL with OpenMP or something, PBGL
> can handle shared memory and prevent overhead from copying
> data from one process space to another (as I get it is
> using MPI)?
> Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net