Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-05 21:48:58

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Others could be considered also as function.hpp, lambda.hpp and lift.hpp, as
> the macros are there to workaround some missing language features, but those
> are much more specialized (Boost.Core?)
>

Boost.Core is where we move code from existing Boost libraries that
enables breaking cyclic dependencies between different Boost
libraries. I'm not so sure new libraries will need to (or want to) put
code there.

Glen