Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [Fit] formal review - should we propose some parts to Boost.Config/Boost.Core
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-05 23:53:27

AMDG

On 03/05/2016 07:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> 
> I want to start a new sub-thread about some of the concerns of Steven
> Watanabe about whether some of the contents of this library fits better
> in Boost.Config. In particular the file boost/fit/returns.hpp.
> 

When I mentioned Boost.Config, I was talking about
things like

#ifndef BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 1
#else
#define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 0
#endif
#endif

or

#ifndef BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS
#if (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined (__clang__) && __GNUC__ == 4 &&
__GNUC_MINOR__ < 7)
#define BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS 0
#else
#define BOOST_FIT_HAS_TEMPLATE_ALIAS 1
#endif
#endif

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe