Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.62.0 Beta 1

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.62.0 Beta 1
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-08-31 22:19:15

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> The first beta packages for 1.62.0 beta 1 are now available:
>>
>>     <https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.61.0.beta.1/>
>>
>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>
>>     f7cc83e6a3b03cd7aa8822992aa3e36422cc2214644d69277ef55a4db51f44bd
>>  boost_1_62_0_b1.7z
>>     4057993811e40b1fd4719675e44c2550b6c2379546192da2299c17fec9a3dddf
>>  boost_1_62_0_b1.tar.bz2
>>     fb0c10b625c5ec47cc837b54740540e400c59571b2eabf427c00f32bffc6ca70
>>  boost_1_62_0_b1.tar.gz
>>     b38ef21c43c5ff814a2144bc23871c134164e7f51c71672d0f49a44636fb50b5
>>  boost_1_62_0_b1.zip
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download
>> the archive of your choice and give building it a try. Please report
>> both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- The release managers
>>
>
> Just to clarify, is the process going forward going to be to not have RCs
> for betas? How about final releases?
>

I don't think it makes sense to make RCs for a beta. If there's something
wrong we just make another beta. But we'll have them for release since it's
not easy to redo those.

(Or did I miss the message with the RC?)
>

Didn't miss it.

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail