|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] really dumb question about quickbook
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-21 12:23:34
On 21 April 2017 at 12:10, Paul A. Bristow via Boost-users
<boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>> From: Daniel James via Boost-users
>>
>> It also wouldn't be too
>> hard to let you add an id to 'endsect', and check that it matches the
>> initial 'section', e.g. the would be an error:
s/the/this/
>>
>> [section:some Something]
>>
>> [endsect:something]
>
> I think perhaps that I'd prefer to use the id rather than full title:
That was meant to illustrate an error - it's an error because it
doesn't match the id.
> From an writing point of view, it would be easiest to be able to copy and paste the whole item
>
> [section:some Further info on Something Complicated]
>
> and edit to
>
> [endsect:some Further info on Something Complicated]
I'm not keen on that, it would be out of date if the section title
changed. Also would confuse people if there's text that's just
ignored.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net