Re: Building with CMake?

From: Heriberto Delgado (heribertod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-25 16:39:29

PLOT TWIST: Boost Build uses CMake internally.

DUN DUN dunnnnn...

(Sorry about that. I have no idea if that’s true.

I know this probably will get me kicked out of this list, but you know, right time, right place :)

> El 24 nov. 2019, a la(s) 10:32, Adder via Boost-users <boost-users_at_[hidden]> escribió:
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 15:46 David Demelier via Boost-users <boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 
>> Le 08/10/2019 à 18:52, Mateusz Loskot via Boost-users a écrit :
>> >> 1. This essentially means library maintainers are choosing to maintain
>> >> at least 2 build systems (bjam for overall boost build, + whatever
>> >> preferential build system they use for the library itself).
>> > 
>> > It is not as difficult or time consuming as one may think.
>> 
>> No offense but who on earth except Boost really use bjam by choice?
> 
> 
> For me, Boost Build is more scalable, better designed, encouraging a saner workflow and file organization, more ambitious, and easier to understand than other build systems I have used.
> 
> I personally think there is much to learn from working with it.
> 
> I hope one day we can make it work a little faster and allow users to override dependence-or-independence of specific targets on specific features/properties.
> 
> But still, I love Boost Build.
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users