Geometry Boost List: [ggl] Header inclusion guards

Subject: [ggl] Header inclusion guards
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2009-04-20 05:50:52

Barend Gehrels wrote:
>>> One thing more about this: the namespace. Should it be changed as
>>>  well?
>>> 
>> 
>> I'd stick to Boost best practice and rename to ggl. [snipped] GIL 
>> variant seems to fit GGL best
> 
> OK, I'll think about it.

You're in charge. I just offer myself to do the dirty work ;-)

> One thing: if we (ever) merge the geometry cores with e.g. GTL we 
> have to reconsider this. But that influences probably only the core 
> part.

What is GTL?

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net