Subject: [ggl] plan
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2009-04-24 20:44:35
Barend Gehrels wrote:
>> I'm wondering if we shouldn't including using path relative to boost,
>> for example in cooridnate_type.hpp:
>> // boost
>> #include <boost/type_traits/remove_const.hpp>
>> // ggl
>> #include <boost/ggl/core/point_type.hpp>
> That is actually anticipating on the acceptance of boost, which is not
> sure yet. It is allowed but I prefer to not yet do that.
> By the way, I would omit the comments on include-order as it is not
> common in Boost. We know the order and it is clear by folders and
Yes, you're right. I was adding some of these comments
before we decided on the conventions. I'll remove it.
>> I'm going to update tests accordingly.
>> Big thanks for the transition job!
> My pleasure. It is probably not yet perfect. I think most things are
> handled. But we'll encounter things next days or weeks, they can be
> solved then.
OK. I'm also testing & updating where necessary over the weekend.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net