Subject: [ggl] space partitioning
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz)
Date: 2010-08-17 13:52:55
Barend Gehrels wrote:
> hi Adam,
>> I'd like to implement kd-tree, quadtree/octree/... and regular grid
>> because these are data structures I've been playing with. Is it ok? Or
>> maby should we design one spacial index?
> For your information, Federico (the student who built the indexes in
> 2008) did implement a quadtree implementation as well. It is not yet in
> the extension folder, because I didn't rework the
> conventions/namings/etc, but I can provide it of course. Yes it is good
> to add the things that are available. I just forgot after a while.
> I think it would be good if there is one library "interface" (Concept)
> with some different implementations. However, the r-tree implementation
> which is currently there does not follow this.
Is this n-dimensional "quad tree"? Has it proper interface?
>> Btw, do you plan to have some generic linear algebra in the library?
> There is some which might be given that name, but note that there is (at
> least one) another library being developed within Boost. That is a very
> promising one and I hope it is reviewed soon.
> As soon as that is sure, we might use that library for our vector/matrix
> calculations (also instead of the uBlas we're currently using).
Yes, I've got similar classes in my 'library' but with different
interface. This functionality is indispensable.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net