Subject: [ggl] spatial index - structure
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande)
Date: 2011-05-13 04:37:45
Thanks a lot for all those tests and numbers. Even though I'm surprised by
those results, I have to agree with your conclusion. The very purpose of
indexing structure is searching and we must focus on this metric. So it
looks like the polymorphic solution is better and we should stick to it,
unless you can think of another way to optimize variants.
Anybody out here has something against that, or any idea to improve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net