Subject: Re: [geometry] [Spatial Index] bug & question
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 10:45:57
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> If reverse() adaptor is not feasible, then rwithin, rcovered_by? ;)
Ok, but the ones proposed by TONGARI would probably be more intuitive.
Don't you think? I.e. bgi::contains() and bgi::covers().
Do we plan to provide those boolean operations: geometry::contains() and
maybe geometry::covers()? Or use those names in different meaning in
Boost Geometry? Barend?
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net