Subject: Re: [geometry] [Spatial Index] bug & question
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 11:19:03
On 19 June 2013 15:45, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> If reverse() adaptor is not feasible, then rwithin, rcovered_by? ;)
> Ok, but the ones proposed by TONGARI would probably be more intuitive. Don't
> you think? I.e. bgi::contains() and bgi::covers().
Yes, I agree that is better, but point is, the 'reverse' thing is confusing,
we mean 'converse', don't we?
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net